| Active : 1 Machines / 4 Threads / 3.4 MNPS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority 0 | ||||||
| Rosent | Winter | quantize_net * | diff | 40.0+0.40 | LLR: 1.31 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 716 W: 159 L: 105 D: 452 Ptnml(0-2): 3, 67, 171, 107, 10 | Quantized network. Should be faster, at the cost of a little accuracy. |
| Priority -1 | ||||||
| Rosent | Winter | net382_d24f64b * | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: 0.48 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 8438 W: 2055 L: 1995 D: 4388 Ptnml(0-2): 181, 983, 1809, 1087, 159 | Added net definition |
| Finished | ||||||
| Rosent | Winter | quantize_net * | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: 2.97 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 1012 W: 301 L: 160 D: 551 Ptnml(0-2): 10, 80, 211, 169, 36 | Quantized network. Should be faster, at the cost of a little accuracy. |
| Rosent | Winter | net382_W50a * | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -2.96 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 4510 W: 1066 L: 1178 D: 2266 Ptnml(0-2): 109, 580, 971, 504, 91 | Net trained with more uniform data. If this is not negative we are happy because it simplifies our life. If this is negative it is fine as it means we were doing something reasonably fine. |
| Rosent | Winter | net347_d24f64 * | diff | 40.0+0.40 | LLR: -2.95 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 4604 W: 872 L: 969 D: 2763 Ptnml(0-2): 60, 555, 1154, 488, 45 | Another day another net. |
| Rosent | Winter | net347_d24f64 * | diff | N=40000 | Elo: 25.02 +- 7.56 (95%) [N=4000] Games: 4020 W: 1277 L: 988 D: 1755 Ptnml(0-2): 95, 414, 767, 575, 159 | Preliminary fixed node test with a potential larger net. |
| Rosent | Winter | net347_W50 * | diff | 40.0+0.40 | LLR: 2.96 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 4838 W: 986 L: 852 D: 3000 Ptnml(0-2): 44, 487, 1244, 579, 65 | Trained with more data. |
| Rosent | Winter | net347_W50 * | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: 3.03 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 2440 W: 644 L: 499 D: 1297 Ptnml(0-2): 38, 241, 541, 338, 62 | Trained with more data. |
| Rosent | Winter | master * | diff | 40.0+0.40 | Elo: 26.89 +- 6.25 (95%) [N=4000] Games: 4000 W: 1002 L: 693 D: 2305 Ptnml(0-2): 33, 354, 963, 571, 79 | Regression Test vs v5.0 |
| Rosent | Winter | net311_ace501v2 * | diff | 40.0+0.40 | LLR: 2.95 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 7672 W: 1608 L: 1462 D: 4602 Ptnml(0-2): 83, 791, 1949, 923, 90 | This is also trained with WSD but more data. I think I need to train with a longer cooldown phase and have a run with the old scheduler which will hopefully finish this afternoon. |
| Rosent | Winter | net311_ace501v3 * | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -3.05 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 29654 W: 7302 L: 7301 D: 15051 Ptnml(0-2): 656, 3723, 6123, 3614, 711 | Comparison of old scheduler vs WSD. Based on my understanding the new scheduler is not properly tuned at the moment, so this should pass. |
| Rosent | Winter | net311_ace501v2 * | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: 3.02 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 19066 W: 4895 L: 4667 D: 9504 Ptnml(0-2): 418, 2294, 3920, 2444, 457 | This is also trained with WSD but more data. I think I need to train with a longer cooldown phase and have a run with the old scheduler which will hopefully finish this afternoon. |
| Rosent | Winter | net311_ace501v2 * | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -3.04 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 4132 W: 961 L: 1078 D: 2093 Ptnml(0-2): 111, 506, 918, 451, 80 | Slight reduction in dataset size, but hopefully higher quality for training. Using WSD scheduler instead of linear. Hoping for small rating gain! |
| Rosent | Winter | net311_ace501 * | diff | 40.0+0.40 | LLR: 2.97 (-2.94, 2.94) [-5.00, 0.00] Games: 15212 W: 2871 L: 2820 D: 9521 Ptnml(0-2): 109, 1621, 4104, 1654, 118 | New approach to training net. Hopefully at least Elo neutral but less blunder prone. |
| Rosent | Winter | net311_ace501 * | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: 2.95 (-2.94, 2.94) [-5.00, 0.00] Games: 56412 W: 13466 L: 13594 D: 29352 Ptnml(0-2): 1179, 6842, 12275, 6748, 1162 | New approach to training net. Hopefully at least Elo neutral but less blunder prone. |
| Rosent | Winter | net_end_p * | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -2.96 (-2.94, 2.94) [-5.00, 0.00] Games: 20464 W: 5192 L: 5430 D: 9842 Ptnml(0-2): 599, 2484, 4207, 2440, 502 | A much more reasonable middle ground. |
| Rosent | Winter | net_end_p * | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -2.98 (-2.94, 2.94) [-5.00, 0.00] Games: 1216 W: 243 L: 393 D: 580 Ptnml(0-2): 54, 189, 236, 111, 18 | Regression testing net training idea. |
| Rosent | Winter | net_end_p * | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: 3.08 (-2.94, 2.94) [-5.00, 0.00] Games: 13636 W: 3293 L: 3219 D: 7124 Ptnml(0-2): 272, 1627, 2966, 1661, 292 | Non-regression sanity check. |
| Rosent | Winter | net_end_p | diff | N=64000 | Elo: 7.25 +- 13.90 (95%) [N=1000] Games: 1006 W: 272 L: 251 D: 483 Ptnml(0-2): 19, 118, 213, 129, 24 | Sanity test of net training |
| Rosent | Winter | net_502_24x64 * | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -2.96 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 6688 W: 1605 L: 1709 D: 3374 Ptnml(0-2): 168, 856, 1382, 788, 150 | Warmup Stable Decay seems to fit the training pipeline better than the previous linear scheduler based on metrics. Does this hold in self play? |
| Rosent | Winter | net_502_24x64 * | diff | N=40000 | Elo: 2.86 +- 7.28 (95%) [N=4000] Games: 4006 W: 1111 L: 1078 D: 1817 Ptnml(0-2): 102, 478, 824, 483, 116 | Get an understanding of how far apart the based increased size net is compared to the current version. Fixed nodes in this case as system load would otherwise distort results. |
| Rosent | Winter | net_502_16x96 * | diff | 10.0+0.10 | LLR: -2.95 (-2.94, 2.94) [-5.00, 0.00] Games: 8948 W: 1999 L: 2170 D: 4779 Ptnml(0-2): 186, 1157, 1942, 1020, 169 | The larger 24x64 net architecture is failing STC so we instead try 16x96. This has far fewer parameters but still has a 5% slowdown we need to overcome. Based on training metrics this lies squarely between the baseline and 24x64. |
| Rosent | Winter | net_502_24x64 * | diff | 10.0+0.10 | LLR: -2.95 (-2.94, 2.94) [-5.00, 0.00] Games: 1566 W: 309 L: 453 D: 804 Ptnml(0-2): 65, 210, 333, 154, 21 | Having passed the fixed node test as expected, we try an STC test with [-5, 0] bounds, as the slowdown is expected to hurt more than in actual play. |
| Rosent | Winter | net_502_24x64 * | diff | N=40000 | LLR: 2.99 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 2282 W: 745 L: 582 D: 955 Ptnml(0-2): 69, 209, 455, 306, 102 | Larger net, hopefully a clear improvement at fixed nodes. Around 16% less Nps. |
| Rosent | Winter | net_311m * | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -3.02 (-2.94, 2.94) [-2.50, 2.50] Games: 17246 W: 4156 L: 4292 D: 8798 Ptnml(0-2): 402, 2127, 3657, 2079, 358 | Trying to better understand the hybrid loss. Both nets are not fully trained, but are at a similar point in training. |
| Rosent | Winter | net_311l * | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -3.10 (-2.94, 2.94) [-3.00, 2.00] Games: 17742 W: 4218 L: 4374 D: 9150 Ptnml(0-2): 424, 2152, 3826, 2094, 375 | Trying to better understand the hybrid loss. Both nets are not fully trained, but are at a similar point in training. 311n removes the CE loss component completely. Even if worth Elo, we may not want this. |
| Rosent | Winter | net_311l * | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -2.97 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 23074 W: 5479 L: 5505 D: 12090 Ptnml(0-2): 487, 2821, 4936, 2817, 476 | Final net with less CE loss component. |