| Active : 0 Machines / 0 Threads / 0 MNPS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority 0 | ||||||
| Rosent | Winter | disallow_consecutive_null_moves * | diff | 40.0+0.40 | LLR: -0.30 (-2.94, 2.94) [-4.00, 1.00] Games: 1584 W: 366 L: 381 D: 837 Ptnml(0-2): 8, 200, 394, 179, 11 | Likely the change is exactly neutral at STC, as consecutive null moves require quite a bit of depth. Lets try LTC! |
| Rosent | Winter | disallow_consecutive_null_moves * | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -1.84 (-2.94, 2.94) [-4.00, 1.00] Games: 25332 W: 5810 L: 5958 D: 13564 Ptnml(0-2): 487, 3094, 5617, 3016, 452 | Consecutive null moves can happen as perspective can make both values fall above beta. This would erroneously register as a position repetition. For this reason we try disallowing repetitions. |
| Finished | ||||||
| Rosent | Winter | move_order_bugfix * | diff | 40.0+0.40 | LLR: 2.95 (-2.94, 2.94) [-4.00, 1.00] Games: 6020 W: 1159 L: 1064 D: 3797 Ptnml(0-2): 40, 628, 1593, 695, 54 | Fixed move ordering bug where history heuristics were ignored if previous move was a null move. |
| Rosent | Winter | move_order_bugfix * | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: 2.95 (-2.94, 2.94) [-4.00, 1.00] Games: 11914 W: 2756 L: 2661 D: 6497 Ptnml(0-2): 199, 1398, 2699, 1431, 230 | Restarted the test as a non-regression patch. It is unclear how much Elo the change should be worth, but it is the more reasonable form, so it should be added even if Elo neutral or slightly negative. |
| Rosent | Winter | move_order_bugfix * | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: 0.04 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 130 W: 30 L: 28 D: 72 Ptnml(0-2): 1, 15, 31, 17, 1 | Fixed move ordering bug where history heuristics were ignored if previous move was a null move. |
| Rosent | Winter | history_reductions * | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -2.96 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 7890 W: 1770 L: 1863 D: 4257 Ptnml(0-2): 146, 997, 1749, 910, 143 | Support for history reductions |
| Rosent | Winter | qnet_402_d32 * | diff | 40.0+0.40 | Elo: 71.79 +- 6.17 (95%) [N=4000] Games: 4000 W: 1273 L: 458 D: 2269 Ptnml(0-2): 12, 185, 915, 752, 136 | Regression test vs v5.0 |
| Rosent | Winter | qnet_402_d32 * | diff | 40.0+0.40 | LLR: 2.95 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 4092 W: 872 L: 744 D: 2476 Ptnml(0-2): 39, 381, 1085, 495, 46 | d32 net update. |
| Rosent | Winter | net382_d24f64b * | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: 0.79 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 9980 W: 2443 L: 2362 D: 5175 Ptnml(0-2): 212, 1170, 2133, 1275, 200 | Added net definition |
| Rosent | Winter | qnet_382_d32 * | diff | 40.0+0.40 | LLR: -0.55 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 20744 W: 3953 L: 3894 D: 12897 Ptnml(0-2): 161, 2233, 5548, 2246, 184 | STC was passed against older master branch, but this is likely to scale even harder than the new master, so trying directly at LTC. |
| Rosent | Winter | qnet_382_d32 * | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: 2.97 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 17098 W: 4326 L: 4111 D: 8661 Ptnml(0-2): 375, 2021, 3560, 2200, 393 | Even larger quantized net. Might not yet be sufficiently mature. |
| Rosent | Winter | qnet_382_d24 * | diff | 40.0+0.40 | LLR: 2.95 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 3404 W: 749 L: 622 D: 2033 Ptnml(0-2): 28, 331, 873, 426, 44 | Now that net is quantized, we try the larger size again. |
| Rosent | Winter | qnet_382_d24 * | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: 2.96 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 12870 W: 3262 L: 3070 D: 6538 Ptnml(0-2): 265, 1499, 2728, 1665, 278 | Now that net is quantized, we try the larger size again. |
| Rosent | Winter | quantize_net * | diff | 40.0+0.40 | LLR: 2.96 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 1382 W: 324 L: 201 D: 857 Ptnml(0-2): 7, 121, 325, 218, 20 | Quantized network. Should be faster, at the cost of a little accuracy. |
| Rosent | Winter | quantize_net * | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: 2.97 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 1012 W: 301 L: 160 D: 551 Ptnml(0-2): 10, 80, 211, 169, 36 | Quantized network. Should be faster, at the cost of a little accuracy. |
| Rosent | Winter | net382_W50a * | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -2.96 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 4510 W: 1066 L: 1178 D: 2266 Ptnml(0-2): 109, 580, 971, 504, 91 | Net trained with more uniform data. If this is not negative we are happy because it simplifies our life. If this is negative it is fine as it means we were doing something reasonably fine. |
| Rosent | Winter | net347_d24f64 * | diff | 40.0+0.40 | LLR: -2.95 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 4604 W: 872 L: 969 D: 2763 Ptnml(0-2): 60, 555, 1154, 488, 45 | Another day another net. |
| Rosent | Winter | net347_d24f64 * | diff | N=40000 | Elo: 25.02 +- 7.56 (95%) [N=4000] Games: 4020 W: 1277 L: 988 D: 1755 Ptnml(0-2): 95, 414, 767, 575, 159 | Preliminary fixed node test with a potential larger net. |
| Rosent | Winter | net347_W50 * | diff | 40.0+0.40 | LLR: 2.96 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 4838 W: 986 L: 852 D: 3000 Ptnml(0-2): 44, 487, 1244, 579, 65 | Trained with more data. |
| Rosent | Winter | net347_W50 * | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: 3.03 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 2440 W: 644 L: 499 D: 1297 Ptnml(0-2): 38, 241, 541, 338, 62 | Trained with more data. |
| Rosent | Winter | master * | diff | 40.0+0.40 | Elo: 26.89 +- 6.25 (95%) [N=4000] Games: 4000 W: 1002 L: 693 D: 2305 Ptnml(0-2): 33, 354, 963, 571, 79 | Regression Test vs v5.0 |
| Rosent | Winter | net311_ace501v2 * | diff | 40.0+0.40 | LLR: 2.95 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 7672 W: 1608 L: 1462 D: 4602 Ptnml(0-2): 83, 791, 1949, 923, 90 | This is also trained with WSD but more data. I think I need to train with a longer cooldown phase and have a run with the old scheduler which will hopefully finish this afternoon. |
| Rosent | Winter | net311_ace501v3 * | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -3.05 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 29654 W: 7302 L: 7301 D: 15051 Ptnml(0-2): 656, 3723, 6123, 3614, 711 | Comparison of old scheduler vs WSD. Based on my understanding the new scheduler is not properly tuned at the moment, so this should pass. |
| Rosent | Winter | net311_ace501v2 * | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: 3.02 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 19066 W: 4895 L: 4667 D: 9504 Ptnml(0-2): 418, 2294, 3920, 2444, 457 | This is also trained with WSD but more data. I think I need to train with a longer cooldown phase and have a run with the old scheduler which will hopefully finish this afternoon. |
| Rosent | Winter | net311_ace501v2 * | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -3.04 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 5.00] Games: 4132 W: 961 L: 1078 D: 2093 Ptnml(0-2): 111, 506, 918, 451, 80 | Slight reduction in dataset size, but hopefully higher quality for training. Using WSD scheduler instead of linear. Hoping for small rating gain! |
| Rosent | Winter | net311_ace501 * | diff | 40.0+0.40 | LLR: 2.97 (-2.94, 2.94) [-5.00, 0.00] Games: 15212 W: 2871 L: 2820 D: 9521 Ptnml(0-2): 109, 1621, 4104, 1654, 118 | New approach to training net. Hopefully at least Elo neutral but less blunder prone. |
| Rosent | Winter | net311_ace501 * | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: 2.95 (-2.94, 2.94) [-5.00, 0.00] Games: 56412 W: 13466 L: 13594 D: 29352 Ptnml(0-2): 1179, 6842, 12275, 6748, 1162 | New approach to training net. Hopefully at least Elo neutral but less blunder prone. |